|
|
Post by jcahill on Sept 13, 2014 16:27:55 GMT -5
3,2,1
|
|
|
|
Post by mchales_army on Sept 13, 2014 16:41:05 GMT -5
Yeah, it's just as I imagined. Looks like dance lessons. 123,123,321,321.
|
|
|
|
Post by shobob on Sept 13, 2014 16:42:55 GMT -5
1,2,3
|
|
|
|
Post by rockindock on Sept 13, 2014 18:03:02 GMT -5
I would vote 1 or 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by captain10a on Sept 13, 2014 22:07:11 GMT -5
My schedule is all over the place. If I know a slot time, I can either be available or make accommodations. I'm better during the day as I often have stuff in the evenings, so I will make it work.
|
|
|
|
Post by kahrtmen on Sept 14, 2014 1:47:38 GMT -5
3-2-1, but I agree with oddson - if we shorten the full draft clock then we won't expect anyone to be up at terrible hours.
|
|
|
|
Post by ronaldb03 on Sept 14, 2014 1:55:29 GMT -5
3,2,1. West Coast night-owl, so doesn't really matter to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by iain on Sept 15, 2014 8:37:02 GMT -5
I'd prefer 1, 2, 3 ... but given our situation with outside owners or anyone available to help who isn't immediately drafting, so if you are unavailable, you can always give a list of however players/cites you want IN ORDER and you get the highest one left on your list.
I travel a fair bit for work, and can be on a plane in the middle of the work day with little notice, so I could get screwed with a noon eastern draft slot.
If you've done your planning it shouldn't be a big deal. I did this in our city draft last fall, and it worked great.
|
|
|
|
Post by nap00 on Sept 15, 2014 10:37:54 GMT -5
1-2-3, but im flexible to any choice. Regardless of the decision, im sure everyone will have periods of inability to access the internet.
|
|
